I never thought of myself as getting old, but when I see a porn movie that released in 1989 labeled as ‘vintage’ in my local porn outlet, I do feel a little dated. The porn movee, ‘Young Girls In Tight Jeans‘, may be 18 years old, but I consider it far from vintage. Maybe the distributors of it consider it ‘vintage’ if the movie actually has some kind of script and was shot before the flood of gonzo porn took over the industry?
Instead of calling porn movies like this vintage, I prefer to think of them as time capsules or ‘remember when men had perms, almost all titties in porn were natural and an anal scene was somewhat rare?‘. This movie has all the trappings of late eighties pop culture, including the soundtrack, hair styles and almost every pussy has hair on it. POV shot with hand held digital cams was yet to happen. Most porn at that time was shot onto video tape cameras mounted on tripods where locations were still rigged for light and sound. Every location required a fair amount of preparation. Not like today where one guy with decent natural light, good digital video camera and a broke college girl willing suck cock on camera for a few bucks can shoot a porn scene.
Maybe the term vintage is relevant to the viewer? I think that is closer to the truth. All the rest is marketing.
Regardless of how this movie was labeled, it is still a great hardcore porn movie to watch. I watched it again last night and I’ll give my review of what I think it’s good points are.
If you did not watch porn in the eighties through the nineties then you might not recognize some of the cast names - Debi Diamond, Nina Hartley, Rachel Ryan, Sharon Kane and Stacy Lords (NOT Tracy). With the exception of Nina Hartley, none of those ladies are still active in porn. Billy Dee, Peter North, Randy Spears and Tom Byron fill out the male list of stars in this movie. As far as I know all of them, except Billy Dee, are still active in porn.
The scene between Peter North and Nina Hartley is incredibly hot. This scene was made long before Nina had her breast implants and she looked really great here. There is some great shots of her super sexy and juicy ass as North fucks her doggy style. When watching this scene, you can see why it has been said that she has the best ass in porn. Her oral technique is great and she and north have a great energy that comes out real natural, sensual and makes for some very great video sex. The scene climaxes as North pulls out and shoots a monster load all over Nina tight tummy. The load is huge, pretty much the standard for Peter Noth.
Sharon Kane would have to be my pick in this film for an examples of that poofy eighties hair. She is really sexy with bright blond hair on her head and her pussy. I was once told that she was not a natural blonde and bleached her pubic hairs too. Personally, I could not care less about that. Any color hair and this woman is still really hot. Right on par with this film, she has a great body, tight belly, nice full round ass, and really sweet perky tits. She is a real treat to watch as she gets double teamed by Randy Spears and Tom Byron. The action is long, with great camera work that gives you great shots of all the penetration. In almost every camera shot Sharons fantastic sexy body is in the center of the screen. If you are into energetic blongs that deliver a really strong cock suck and love the deep fucking that happens on camera, then her work in this sex video is right up your alley.
Randy West probably had the easiest job in this sex video. The opening scene he gets to kick back on a couch while Rachel Ryan and Stacy Lords take turns at sucking his cock. Both of these girls are such sexy young goddesses and look wonderful as they swap his cock between their mouths and lick his balls. As with any good blowjob in porn, the inevitable facial happens and these two girls are just so happy to get a tast of it.
This movie is a great work of late eighties video sex to watch. The picture quality and sound are very good. If there is a negative point about the DVD I would have to mention is that the extras are nothing to write home about. Just not a lot there. But given the time this movie was made, DVDs did not exist yet, so nobody was shooting porn in mind for distributing it with bonus features. Besides, who buys porn for the bonus features anyways?
You can call this movie vintage porn if you want to. To me it’s not vintage at all. To me it’s just really damned good porn and is worth the time of any porn lover would take to watch it.